deanrichardkibbe.net
TOP SECRET (See also: deanrichardkibbe.com, deanrichardkibbe.biz;and, saintvibiana.com)
Anchor Clankers
The text below is posted as a text file, word for word, from a self-explanatory letter to then Senator Levin. The portion of the letter which is underneath the bottom of the text below, which is in the original letter, was not included in this post because it could jeopardize the lives and/or accurate records of several persons, until other matters have been resolved. The images below are cropped versions of the screenshots referred to in said letter...
George W. Bush ranch
August 18, 2005
To:
Office of Senator Carl Levin:
I am sending this email in regards to a letter I sent by registered mail, and have received the return receipt for, to the Armed Services Committee, regarding reports involving the Combined Action Program, ("CAP"), which were assigned to Armed Services by the Senate Investigations subcommittee. To clarify the matter, I am copying a text file copy of said letter to my computer clipboard and pasting it into this letter below, after which I will continue the content of the instant letter with details of the present circumstances.
(SENT LETTER):
,
General Counsel,
Senate Armed Services Committee,
and/or other jurisdictionally related parties:
in re: The "Combined Action Program"
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
I hereby request, as a reasonable courtesy, and/or as a Freedom of Information Act request, if necessary, all information available by any military, intelligence, and/or any other type(s) of files and/or sources, including, but not limited to, any information and/or conclusions obtained and/or otherwise acquired, by the Senate Armed Services Committee, regarding said incidents, for the two incidents listed below, for the sample month submitted in my report involving the Combined Action Program, referred from the Senate Investigations Subcommittee to the Senate Armed Services Committee, and originally assigned to Peter Levine, General Counsel, Senate Armed Services Committee, (legally recorded phone conversation available if necessary), as stated below:
(1.) A listing of the longitude and latitude for the assassination of the village of 28 unarmed Vietnamese civilians, by the Central Intelligence Agency ,on 22 November, 1968, under jurisdiction of CAP 1-3-5, First Combined Action Group, Combined Action Program, Third Marine Amphibious Force, at 14:54 Hours, in the Republic of Viet Nam, and all other recorded information regarding said incident.
(2.) The name, rank, serial number, military occupational specialty, last assigned job title, last assigned job function, including military specifications of said job function, last assigned unit, longitude and latitude of incident, and all other related data for said incident, for the United States Marine officer assassinated by the Central Intelligence Agency, after leaving CAP 1-3-8, First Combined Action Group, Combined Action Program, Third Marine Amphibious Force, at 17:00 Hours, on 11 November, 1968, in the Republic of Viet Nam, and all other recorded information regarding said incident.
Although the above two incidents are only two of many, even for just the sample month, one thing I learned even before being assigned as a military advisor to the "Combined Action Program", is that policies which are carried out in a given tactical area of responsibility gifted with ground combat are usually carried out the same way over and over, in certain parameters. I think it might be easier to find the patterns which would require consistency, by analyzing a smaller number of samples in greater detail, and then investigating similar incidents, such as terminal silencing of dissident villages, early retirement for U.S. Marine officers, etc., to catalogue the consistent patterns.
If you think there is anybody not admitting to being a direct employee of the Central Intelligence Agency, who is still alive, that could figure out the assassination patterns of the Central Intelligence Agency, through their cover in the "Combined Action Program", better than I can, I would like you to keep them as far away from me as possible...
Dean R. Kibbe
P.O. Box ......(redacted obsolete mailing address)
Dated: April 29, 2005
(END OF SENT LETTER)
The above letter, sent in hard copy paper form, is a simple request for information which should be accessible by cross-referencing military files which could be verified by unclassified documents. After allowing much time for the matter to be investigated/resolved, I wrote said letter to Armed Services about reports I filed, and documents obtained through then Congressman David Bonior's Port Huron office, and similar sources, which indicated patterns demonstrating routine assassinations of Vietnamese civilians, and U.S. marine military advisors, officers, and in the bush, enlisted, American personnel, by the Central Intelligence Agency. A copy was also sent to the White House. The only response I've got so far is the top domain of the Department of Defense's Network Information Center, and the Department of the Navy, trying to hack into my computer, and threats concerning myself at my home made by the Central Intelligence Agency. I live at 1223 Union Street, Port Huron, Michigan; and, at this point I have nothing left to lose.
I have software on my internet computer which allows me to track anyone trying to hack into my computer. See the JPEG images attached, of screenshots of somebody with a secure line connecting to a hub near Dallas, with a high enough clearance to tap into the DoD computer hacking agency in Vienna, Virginia, (nic.mil), and another instance by the Department of the Navy, and using their IP address to try to hack into my computer. I was able to get enough information from the attempted hack by the computer linking through the Dallas area to get the actual physical address and nine digit zip code etc., of nic.mil's secret servers. I hope they liked the flowers I had sent, along with a card that said: "These are for your sister...". I didn't get near as much information from the Department of the Navy's attempted hack, although I still got enough to identify the source, and their IP address etc.; which probably means that, unless the Joint Chiefs of Staff have a ranch in Texas, the President of the United States probably has less experience trying to hack into computers of civilians than the Department of the Navy...
I don't keep anything of any significance on my internet computer, except for occasional files I might type up and/or transfer temporarily from one of my other computers to send in an email, or something similar. I have people from here to China, literally, including DoD, that try to break into my internet computer whenever I'm online. Sometimes I get several more port scans when I'm tracing an IP address; so, I have to look at the maps and network info from several hackers, from all over the world, before I can get back to what I was trying to do. When I'm on the internet, I feel like somebody inside a Land Rover, driving through an African wildlife preserve, with the windows rolled up, watching the monkeys climb all over the car, trying to figure out how to get in. If the Department of the Navy, and/or any other branch/agency, etc., wants any information from me about "CAP", or other related data, it would be a lot easier if they just asked me. Most of the specific hard copy data I have from "CAP", etc., was obtained from some government agency or another, or obtained routinely by myself through unclassified sources, and I could just point out folder categories to look under to find even more data they should have access to. Information somebody else might consider trivial and/or irrelevant to showing patterns of ordered assassination might be the most crucial, because irrelevant patterns often accompany seemingly unrelated actions for reasons that are secondary to procedures taken in certain actions.
Even though I had a secondary m.o.s. of recon, a third m.o.s. for "CAP", and finally a fourth m.o.s. of range coach, my primary m.o.s. was rifleman. If a lawyer needs to remember something essential to winning their case, they can just have a research clerk run to the local law library; and, if they lose, they still get paid, unless it's on a contingency, in which case they'll probably hope to settle out of court. If a rifleman doesn't remember everything they need to know when on a patrol or ambush, they might blow themselves up before they even encounter the enemy; and, if they encounter the enemy and lose, the best they can hope for is a closed casket so it doesn't make people puke. The human mind in combat has to go into a mode which will allow them to assess their present situation in an instant in order to survive. While officers were drawing circles and squares around tactical areas of responsibilities, assigning basic objectives, sticking pins on maps, and trying to figure what the relationship is between four, five, and six, riflemen would hear a major chord, and know it was probably time for a cymbal crash. I think most people don't realize that the world lived in by riflemen in combat, no matter what side they're on, is a secret society, with it's own traditions, passed on by other riflemen in combat. In Viet Nam it would have been easier to get by with murder out in the bush, than to get by with saying dirty words over the radio, if the other members of the squad or fireteam were willing to go along with it. Once a squad left the command post, what a squad did, and where they were actually at, was between the members walking in the squad at that time, and anybody they informed over the radio, if their radio reports were true and accurate, which was not always the case. It was common for marine rifle squads leaving the command post to indulge in a practice known as "bagging the bush into CAP", by entering the nearest CAP unit instead of heading to their assigned ambush sight. It was a tradition handed down in rifle companies isolated from each other, as well as those sharing the same command post. It was a convenient method to transfer information from rifle squads to CAP, and vice versa, although it would probably only be recorded in deeply buried C.I.A. files, and not Marine Corps files, except where Marines were injured or killed in a CAP unit they were not assigned to, during a firefight or other circumstances, which might be a possible link for cross-referencing on CAP. Back then there was no Freedom of Information Act. If "intelligence" people would have known there would be, some day, I'm sure they would have covered the tracks of their evil much better.
I can see irregularities that someone never in the bush in Viet Nam would not ever notice. Look at just the simple records in the sample month. Does it sound logical that "significant contacts" would be almost exclusively limited to zero or one weapons captured, especially with the 28 alleged Viet Cong killed referred to in the above said letter having zero weapons captured? I think if you check the statistics involving the Marine officer killed, referred to in the above said letter, you will find repeating patterns that show the orders came from very high up in the chain of command. If you allow murderers to get by with murders by a lapse of time, what will you do to keep murder in a war zone from becoming the national past time? Especially with a war zone where suicide car bombers are an everyday story. I'm not trying to prove a case. I'm just trying to get somebody to do a fair investigation, and/or give me the information so I can try to do it myself. If you try to do it secretly, the C.I.A. can sandbag you before you even get started. Are you planning to investigate the matter or cover it up? I certainly have a right to a substantial reasonable answer. Otherwise, who are you supposed to be representing?
The main reason I have spent more time on trying to bring the C.I.A. to justice for war crimes than domestic crimes committed by the C.I.A. is that I can show somebody how to cross reference through military files to prove murders through "CAP", while in regards to domestic issues, because I am the only living non-C.I.A. witness I know the whereabouts of, it is my word against theirs. The domestic activities, as illegal as they are, in regards to secrecy, make black ops look like white agents. I will now explain my current situation, which I usually don't discuss because it sounds so unusual, compared to things other people usually experience. There is no dispute on findings of law. It's my word against theirs on findings of fact. There is more at stake than just "CAP".
Select a page from the menu below. Left-click on button for page until button turns green.
Scroll down under buttons for new page.
It has come to my attention that the website builder I use sets supposedly non-tracking cookies of some kind, unless you set your browser to block all cookies, which I recommend.
You can delete all cookies and other data after you visit any website, which I also recommend.
Files linked to buttons are stored on deanrichardkibbe.org which handles large file sizes
SUPPORT THE WORLDWIDE GENERAL STRIKE AND THE BAN ON ALL WARS...
BOYCOTT NEW CARS
ON CELL PHONES MENU MIGHT BE LOCATED BY SELECTING A SMALL SYMBOL, SUCH AS A SMALL SQUARE WITH HORIZONTAL LINES, RATHER THAN SEPARATE MENU BUTTONS AS ON A COMPUTER SCREEN...